Chennai Super Kings vs Mumbai Indians Match Scorecard – IPL 2026 (Match 33 & 44)
14 mins read

Chennai Super Kings vs Mumbai Indians Match Scorecard – IPL 2026 (Match 33 & 44)

Chennai Super Kings defeated Mumbai Indians in both their IPL 2026 league stage encounters – by 103 runs at Wankhede Stadium on April 23 and by 8 wickets at MA Chidambaram Stadium on May 2. The Chennai Super Kings vs Mumbai Indians match scorecard from both fixtures tells a clear story: CSK were dominant at every phase of play, while MI struggled for consistency in batting and failed to defend totals with their bowling. This page covers full scorecards, playing XIs, phase-wise breakdowns, fall of wickets, partnership data, and verified match analysis for both matches.

Match Summary

Read More: Chennai Super Kings vs SunRisers Hyderabad match scorecard

The table below provides a quick reference for both CSK vs MI encounters in IPL 2026.

MatchVenueDateCSK ScoreMI ScoreResult
Match 33Wankhede, MumbaiApril 23, 2026207/6 (20 Ov)104 All Out (19 Ov)CSK won by 103 runs
Match 44Chepauk, ChennaiMay 2, 2026160/2 (18.1 Ov)159/7 (20 Ov)CSK won by 8 wickets

CSK won five of their last six IPL encounters against MI heading into these fixtures. The 103-run loss in Match 33 was MI’s largest defeat against CSK in IPL history, surpassing their previous low of 136/8 at Dubai in 2021.

Match 33: MI vs CSK – April 23, 2026, Wankhede Stadium

The Chennai Super Kings vs Mumbai Indians match scorecard from Match 33 reflects one of the most one-sided El Clasico fixtures in recent IPL history. Sanju Samson‘s unbeaten century powered CSK to 207/6, and then Akeal Hosein’s four-wicket haul dismantled MI for 104 in 19 overs – their lowest total against CSK in IPL history.

Toss: Mumbai Indians won the toss and elected to bowl
Result: Chennai Super Kings won by 103 runs
Player of the Match: Sanju Samson – 101* (54 balls)

Playing XIs – Match 33

Chennai Super Kings: Sanju Samson (wk), Ruturaj Gaikwad (c), Sarfaraz Khan, Dewald Brevis, Shivam Dube, Kartik Sharma, Jamie Overton, Noor Ahmad, Anshul Kamboj, Gurjapneet Singh, Mukesh Choudhary
Impact Player (In): Akeal Hosein (replaced Kartik Sharma)

Mumbai Indians: Quinton de Kock (wk), Naman Dhir, Suryakumar Yadav, Hardik Pandya (c), Tilak Varma, Sherfane Rutherford, Mitchell Santner, Jasprit Bumrah, Krish Bhagat, AM Ghazanfar, Ashwani Kumar
Impact Player (In): Danish Malewar (replaced AM Ghazanfar)

CSK Batting Scorecard – 207/6 (20 Overs)

Sanju Samson’s 101* off 54 balls was the innings that made this total possible. He hit 9 fours and 6 sixes at a strike rate of 187.04 – his second century of IPL 2026 and fifth career IPL hundred.

BatterDismissalRB4s6sSR
Ruturaj Gaikwad (c)b Ghazanfar22
Sanju Samson (wk)Not Out1015496187.04
Sarfaraz Khan
Dewald Brevis21
Shivam Dube
Kartik Sharma18
Jamie Overton
Akeal Hosein (Impact)Not Out22*
Extras
Total207/620 Ov10.35 RR

CSK Phase-Wise Batting – Match 33:

PhaseOversRunsWicketsRPO
Powerplay0–672212.00
Middle + Death7–2013549.64

CSK’s powerplay score of 72/2 was the highest powerplay total across both fixtures. Despite losing two early wickets, Samson took control from the first over he faced and never released that control. The Samson–Kartik Sharma partnership of 43 runs and the late Samson–Hosein stand took CSK comfortably past 200.

MI Bowling vs CSK – Match 33

BowlerOMRWER
AM Ghazanfar4.002526.25
Ashwani Kumar0372
Jasprit Bumrah0
Others

Ghazanfar’s 2/25 was MI’s most economical bowling effort, but the damage was done in the death overs where Samson accelerated to finish unbeaten on 101. No MI bowler was able to contain the run flow once Samson reached the 70s.

MI Batting Scorecard – 104 All Out (19 Overs)

MI’s top order disintegrated inside three overs. Three wickets fell for 11 runs before the innings had any shape. Tilak Varma (37) and Suryakumar Yadav (35) briefly stabilised the innings, but once they fell in quick succession, MI’s chase was over as a contest.

BatterDismissalRB4s6sSR
Quinton de Kock (wk)b Choudhary7100170.00
Danish Malewar (Impact)c Samson b Hosein01000.00
Naman Dhirb Hosein03000.00
Suryakumar Yadavc Khan b Hosein353050116.67
Tilak Varmab Hosein372950127.59
Hardik Pandya (c)c Choudhary b Ahmad120050.00
Sherfane Rutherfordc Kamboj b Ahmad01000.00
Shardul Thakur (Impact)c Brevis b Kamboj6120050.00
Krish Bhagatc Singh b Overton7150046.67
Ashwani KumarNot Out160016.67
Jasprit Bumrahc Samson b Singh250040.00
Extras8
Total104/1019.0 Ov5.47 RR

CSK Bowling vs MI – Match 33

Akeal Hosein’s impact player appearance produced one of the finest T20 bowling spells in this IPL season – 4 wickets for just 17 runs in 4 overs at an economy of 4.25.

BowlerOMRWER
Akeal Hosein (Impact)4.011744.25
Mukesh Choudhary4.003117.75
Anshul Kamboj3.001013.33
Noor Ahmad4.002325.75
Jamie Overton2.001417.00
Gurjapneet Singh2.00713.50

Fall of Wickets – MI Innings, Match 33

#BatterScoreOver
1Danish Malewar7/11.0
2Quinton de Kock7/21.5
3Naman Dhir11/32.3
4Tilak Varma84/411.5
5Hardik Pandya85/512.1
6Sherfane Rutherford85/612.2
7Suryakumar Yadav87/713.1
8Krish Bhagat100/817.0
9Shardul Thakur100/917.1
10Jasprit Bumrah104/1019.0

Three wickets fell in three deliveries between overs 12.1 and 13.1 – the score moved from 84/4 to 87/7 in the space of five balls. That five-ball collapse ended any remaining chance MI had of a competitive total.

Phase-Wise Scoring – MI Chase, Match 33

PhaseOversRunsWicketsRPO
Powerplay0–62934.83
Middle Overs7–135848.29
Death Overs14–191732.83

Chasing 208, MI were 11/3 in the third over. The required run rate crossed 18 per over before the fourth over began – a rate no T20 side has consistently managed from that position in IPL history.

Match 44: CSK vs MI – May 2, 2026, MA Chidambaram Stadium

When reviewing the Chennai Super Kings vs Mumbai Indians match scorecard from Match 44, the result looks closer on paper – one run separated the two sides’ totals. But the manner of CSK’s chase, completed with 11 balls to spare, showed the gap in batting quality. Ruturaj Gaikwad and Kartik Sharma shared an unbroken 98-run partnership that made the target look straightforward.

Toss: Mumbai Indians won the toss and elected to bat
Result: Chennai Super Kings won by 8 wickets (11 balls remaining)
Player of the Match: Ruturaj Gaikwad – 67* (48 balls)

Playing XIs – Match 44

Chennai Super Kings: Sanju Samson (wk), Ruturaj Gaikwad (c), Urvil Patel, Dewald Brevis, Shivam Dube, Jamie Overton, Prashant Veer, Ramakrishna Ghosh, Noor Ahmad, Anshul Kamboj, Mukesh Choudhary
Impact Player (In): Kartik Sharma (replaced Mukesh Choudhary)

Mumbai Indians: Ryan Rickelton (wk), Will Jacks, Naman Dhir, Suryakumar Yadav, Tilak Varma, Hardik Pandya (c), Robin Minz, Krish Bhagat, Trent Boult, Jasprit Bumrah, AM Ghazanfar
Impact Player (In): Raghu Sharma (replaced Robin Minz)

MI Batting Scorecard – 159/7 (20 Overs)

MI’s innings was held together by Naman Dhir’s 57 off 37 balls – the highest score across all MI batters in both matches. Ryan Rickelton gave MI a fast start with 37 off 24, but the middle order could not push MI beyond 159 once Kamboj and Noor Ahmad took control.

BatterDismissalRB4s6sSR
Ryan Rickelton (wk)b Noor Ahmad3724
Will Jacksb Kamboj
Naman Dhir5737
Suryakumar Yadav21
Tilak Varmab Noor Ahmad5
Hardik Pandya (c)18
Raghu Sharma (Impact)
Krish BhagatNot Out3
Extras
Total159/720 Ov7.95 RR

CSK Bowling vs MI – Match 44

Anshul Kamboj (3/32) and Noor Ahmad (2/26) were the two match-defining bowlers for CSK in this fixture. Kamboj struck in the second over with the wicket of Will Jacks, denying MI their planned opening platform. Jamie Overton’s 1/23 in 4 overs at an economy of 5.75 was the most economical full-quota spell of the match.

BowlerOMRWER
Anshul Kamboj4.003238.00
Noor Ahmad4.002626.50
Jamie Overton4.002315.75
Prashant Veer
Ramakrishna Ghosh

MI Phase-Wise Scoring – Match 44

Read More: Nepal national cricket team vs Canada national cricket team timeline

PhaseOversRunsWicketsRPO
Powerplay0–65719.50
Middle Overs7–156547.22
Death Overs16–203727.40

MI’s powerplay of 57/1 was their most competitive phase across both matches. However, four wickets in the middle overs for 65 runs – with Noor Ahmad and Kamboj doing the damage – pulled MI back from what looked like a 175+ total in the 12th over.

Fall of Wickets – MI Innings, Match 44

#BatterScoreOver
1Will Jacks1/11.2
2Ryan Rickelton59/26.4
3–7Middle and Lower Order59–1597.0–20.0

The early removal of Will Jacks in the second ball of the second over was the first turning point of Match 44. It denied MI their planned overseas opener combination and forced a reshuffle that disrupted batting momentum.

CSK Chase Batting – 160/2 (18.1 Overs)

Ruturaj Gaikwad’s unbeaten 67 off 48 balls was a measured, tactical knock – not flashy, but exactly what the chase required. Urvil Patel’s 24 off just 12 balls at a strike rate of 200 was the explosion that set up the acceleration. Kartik Sharma then anchored the finish with a maiden IPL half-century.

BatterDismissalRB4s6sSR
Sanju Samson (wk)c Rickelton b Bumrah11920122.22
Ruturaj Gaikwad (c)Not Out674852139.58
Urvil Patelb Ghazanfar241222200.00
Kartik Sharma (Impact)Not Out544043135.00
Extras4
Total160/218.1 Ov8.81 RR

MI Bowling vs CSK – Match 44

Jasprit Bumrah took the only wicket that mattered – Sanju Samson for 11 – but conceded 20 runs in 3 overs at an economy of 6.67, above his career economy of 7.33. No other MI bowler maintained control once Gaikwad and Kartik Sharma settled.

BowlerOMRWER
Jasprit Bumrah3.002016.67
Trent Boult3.1037011.68
AM Ghazanfar4.0040110.00
Raghu Sharma (Impact)4.002406.00
Hardik Pandya2.001708.50
Krish Bhagat2.0022011.00

Trent Boult conceded 37 runs in 3.1 overs at an economy of 11.68 – the worst bowling performance of either match across all bowlers. Combined with Ghazanfar’s 1/40 in 4 overs, MI had no pressure option outside Bumrah after the fifth over.

Fall of Wickets – CSK Chase, Match 44

#BatterScoreOver
1Sanju Samson13/12.0
2Urvil Patel62/25.4

CSK lost both wickets inside six overs yet still posted 62/2 in the powerplay – a powerplay total higher than MI’s despite being two down. That reading of the chase was the difference.

Partnership Analysis – CSK Chase, Match 44

PartnershipBattersRunsBalls
1st WicketSamson & Gaikwad1312
2nd WicketGaikwad & Urvil Patel4922
3rd Wicket (unbroken)Gaikwad & Kartik Sharma9875

The 49-run second-wicket stand off 22 balls brought the required run rate below 8 per over inside six overs. The unbroken 98-run third-wicket stand between Ruturaj Gaikwad and Kartik Sharma then sealed the match with 11 balls to spare – the most decisive passage of play in Match 44.

CSK Chase Phase-Wise – Match 44

PhaseOversRunsWicketsRPO
Powerplay0–662210.33
Middle Overs7–18.1980

Complete Stats: Both Matches Combined

Top Run Scorers

PlayerTeamMatchRBSR
Sanju SamsonCSKMatch 33101*54187.04
Ruturaj GaikwadCSKMatch 4467*48139.58
Kartik SharmaCSKMatch 4454*40135.00
Naman DhirMIMatch 445737
Tilak VarmaMIMatch 333729127.59
Ryan RickeltonMIMatch 443724
Suryakumar YadavMIMatch 333530116.67
Urvil PatelCSKMatch 442412200.00
Akeal HoseinCSKMatch 3322*

Top Wicket Takers

BowlerTeamMatchORWER
Akeal HoseinCSKMatch 334.01744.25
Anshul KambojCSKMatch 444.03238.00
Noor AhmadCSKMatch 334.02325.75
Noor AhmadCSKMatch 444.02626.50
AM GhazanfarMIMatch 334.02526.25
Anshul KambojCSKMatch 333.01013.33
Jamie OvertonCSKMatch 444.02315.75
Gurjapneet SinghCSKMatch 332.0713.50
Jasprit BumrahMIMatch 443.02016.67

Head-to-Head Record: CSK vs MI – IPL 2026

CSK dominated both meetings in IPL 2026, winning the Chennai Super Kings vs Mumbai Indians match scorecard battle across every phase.

FixtureVenueToss WinnerResultMargin
Match 33Wankhede, MumbaiMICSK won103 runs
Match 44Chepauk, ChennaiMICSK won8 wickets

MI won the toss in both fixtures and still lost both matches – a data point that reflects CSK’s adaptability regardless of conditions or match position.

Key Tactical Takeaways

How CSK Controlled Both Matches

The Chennai Super Kings vs Mumbai Indians match scorecard across both fixtures reveals a consistent pattern in CSK’s game plan. Powerplay bowling discipline was CSK’s primary weapon in Match 33. Three wickets in 2.3 overs reduced MI to 11/3, removing de Kock, Malewar, and Dhir before the innings had any foundation. Hosein, Kamboj, and Ahmad were all used in rotations designed to exploit the Wankhede pitch early. In Match 44, CSK’s bowling was more measured – conceding 57/1 in the powerplay – but Kamboj’s second-over wicket (Will Jacks) denied MI their planned start. The middle-over phase then became CSK’s kill zone, with four wickets falling for 65 runs between overs 7 and 15. CSK’s batting approach in both matches was chase-structured. In March 33, Samson anchored and accelerated. In Match 44, Gaikwad and Patel attacked the powerplay despite two early wickets, bringing the rate down for Kartik Sharma to finish.

MI’s Recurring Problems

MI recorded top-order collapses below 40/3 in both their powerplay phases across the two matches – 29/3 at Wankhede and, indirectly, 1/1 in the second ball at Chepauk disrupting their batting order. No MI batter between positions 4 and 7 scored more than 21 runs in either of the two middle-order phases where stabilisation was required. The team’s reliance on one or two individual performances – Samson at Wankhede, Dhir at Chepauk – meant that when the top order failed, no secondary tier was available to rebuild.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs):

Q1: What was the result of CSK vs MI in IPL 2026?

A1: CSK won both matches. They beat MI by 103 runs at Wankhede (Match 33, April 23, 2026) and by 8 wickets at Chepauk (Match 44, May 2, 2026).

Q2: What was the full Chennai Super Kings vs Mumbai Indians match scorecard in Match 33?

A2: CSK scored 207/6 in 20 overs, led by Sanju Samson’s 101* off 54 balls. MI were bowled out for 104 in 19 overs. Akeal Hosein took 4/17 for CSK.

Q3: What was the full scorecard of CSK vs MI Match 44?

A3: MI scored 159/7 in 20 overs, with Naman Dhir top-scoring on 57. CSK chased 160 in 18.1 overs, losing just 2 wickets. Ruturaj Gaikwad scored 67* and Kartik Sharma 54*. Anshul Kamboj took 3/32.

Q4: Who was the Player of the Match in CSK vs MI Match 33?

A4: Sanju Samson won Player of the Match for his unbeaten 101 off 54 balls – 9 fours, 6 sixes, strike rate 187.04.

Q5: Who was the Player of the Match in CSK vs MI Match 44?

A5: Ruturaj Gaikwad won Player of the Match for his unbeaten 67 off 48 balls (SR 139.58).

Q6: What was MI’s lowest total against CSK in IPL history?

A6: 104 all out at Wankhede in Match 33 of IPL 2026 is MI’s lowest total against CSK in IPL history, surpassing their previous low of 136/8 at Dubai in 2021.

Q7: What were Jasprit Bumrah’s bowling figures in Match 44?

A7: Bumrah took 1/20 in 3 overs at an economy of 6.67 in Match 44 at Chepauk.

Q8: What was the Ruturaj–Kartik Sharma partnership in Match 44?

A8: Ruturaj Gaikwad and Kartik Sharma shared an unbroken 98-run third-wicket partnership off 75 balls, sealing the chase with 11 balls to spare.

Q9: What were Akeal Hosein’s figures in MI vs CSK Match 33?

A9: Hosein, playing as an impact sub, took 4 wickets for 17 runs in 4 overs at an economy of 4.25 – the best bowling figures across both IPL 2026 CSK vs MI matches.

Q10: Did CSK vs MI results affect the IPL 2026 playoff race?

A10: Yes. CSK’s back-to-back wins kept their playoff chances active, while MI’s two losses significantly reduced their qualification prospects for IPL 2026.




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *