Pakistan National Cricket Team Vs Namibia National Cricket Team Match Scorecard – T20 World Cup 2026
Pakistan National Cricket Team vs Namibia National Cricket Team Match Scorecard from the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2026, Pakistan defeated Namibia by 102 runs at the Sinhalese Sports Club Ground, Colombo, on February 18, 2026. Pakistan posted a commanding 199/3, built around Sahibzada Farhan’s unbeaten 100 off 58 balls, before their spin attack bowled Namibia out for just 97 runs in 17.3 overs. This result confirmed Pakistan’s place in the Super Eight stage and eliminated Namibia from the tournament. Every scorecard-intent search around this fixture ultimately circles back to one number: a 102-run margin that reshaped the entire complexion of Group A. This breakdown goes beyond the headline result to cover the full batting and bowling cards, partnership data, tactical decision-making, and the statistical depth that most recap-style match reports skip entirely. If you’re searching for the complete Pakistan National Cricket Team vs Namibia National Cricket Team Match Scorecard, everything from powerplay numbers to points-table implications is covered below.
Match Facts and Background
The Pakistan National Cricket Team vs Namibia National Cricket Team Match Scorecard belongs to the 35th match of Group A at the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2026, played under lights in Colombo. Pakistan entered the fixture needing a win to keep their Super Eight hopes alive after a mixed group stage, while Namibia were already facing an uphill qualification battle following three straight defeats against stronger opposition.
| Detail | Information |
| Match | 35th Match, Group A, ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2026 |
| Date | February 18, 2026 |
| Venue | Sinhalese Sports Club Ground, Colombo |
| Toss | Pakistan won the toss, elected to bat |
| Result | Pakistan won by 102 runs |
| Player of the Match | Sahibzada Farhan (100* off 58 balls) |
| Umpires | Chris Gaffaney (New Zealand), Richard Illingworth (England) |
| TV Umpire | Kumar Dharmasena (Sri Lanka) |

Why This Fixture Mattered
Pakistan had lost momentum after a shaky start to the group stage, and a defeat here would have realistically ended their T20 World Cup campaign before the knockout rounds even began. Namibia, by contrast, had nothing to lose and everything to prove against a full-strength Test-playing nation-a dynamic that shaped the aggressive intent Pakistan’s top order showed from the very first over of the innings. The Sinhalese Sports Club pitch was known through the tournament for offering turns as the match progressed, which made the toss decision to bat first significant. Pakistan’s think tank clearly wanted to set a target and bowl second on a wearing surface, banking on their spin depth to exploit exactly the conditions that eventually unfolded in the second innings.
Pakistan Batting Scorecard
Pakistan posted 199/3 in their allotted 20 overs, running at a rate of 9.95 per over-their highest total of the tournament to that point. The innings was built almost entirely around one player, with Sahibzada Farhan involved in every meaningful partnership across the twenty overs, a rarity in modern T20 cricket where scoring responsibility is typically distributed across the order.
Read More: Bangladesh National Cricket Team vs Pakistan National Cricket Team Timeline
| Batter | Dismissal | Runs | Balls | 4s | 6s | Strike Rate |
| Sahibzada Farhan | not out | 100 | 58 | 11 | 4 | 172.41 |
| Saim Ayub | c Green b Brassell | 14 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 116.66 |
| Salman Agha (c) | c Erasmus b Brassell | 38 | 23 | 3 | 2 | 165.21 |
| Khawaja Nafay | c & b Erasmus | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 100.00 |
| Shadab Khan | not out | 36 | 22 | 1 | 3 | 163.63 |
Extras: 6 (lb 2, w 4) | Fall of Wickets: 1-40 (Ayub, 5.1 ov), 2-107 (Agha, 12.1 ov), 3-118 (Nafay, 13.2 ov)
Sahibzada Farhan’s Century Breakdown
Farhan’s innings was a study in controlled acceleration rather than reckless hitting from ball one. His first fifty came off 37 balls as he settled into the pace of the pitch and assessed the bowling lineup, but the second fifty took only 20 balls once he identified Namibia’s weaker bowling options in the death overs. This was his maiden T20I century and the third hundred of the entire T20 World Cup 2026-a new tournament record for individual centuries at that point in the competition. What made the innings statistically remarkable wasn’t just the runs but the shot selection. Eleven boundaries and four sixes came from a mix of conventional cricket shots early on, transitioning into more improvised strokes-scoops and slog-sweeps-once Namibia’s bowlers began varying their pace in a desperate attempt to disrupt his rhythm. That adaptability is precisely why scouts and analysts flagged this innings as a genuine breakout performance rather than a one-off flat-track score.
The Middle-Order Contribution
Salman Agha’s 38 off 23 balls is easy to overlook next to a century, but it was the innings that gave Farhan the platform to accelerate. Agha targeted the spin bowlers introduced in the middle overs, taking down anything short or full with clean hitting through the off side, and his strike rate of 165.21 meant Pakistan never lost momentum between the powerplay and the death overs.
Namibia Bowling Figures
Namibia’s bowling attack struggled to find consistent lines against an in-form Pakistan top order, leaking runs across every phase of the innings. No bowler finished with an economy rate below 8.00, which reflects how comprehensively Pakistan controlled the tempo of the innings from start to finish.
| Bowler | Overs | Maidens | Runs | Wickets | Economy |
| JJ Smit | 3 | 0 | 28 | 0 | 9.33 |
| MG Erasmus | 3 | 0 | 25 | 1 | 8.33 |
| R Trumpelmann | 4 | 0 | 36 | 0 | 9.00 |
| JT Brassell | 4 | 0 | 48 | 2 | 12.00 |
| WP Myburgh | 2 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 13.50 |
| BM Scholtz | 4 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 8.25 |
Ruben Trumpelmann, Namibia’s most experienced new-ball bowler, was expected to trouble the top order early, but Farhan and Ayub took him down for 40 runs off their 31-ball opening stand, effectively neutralizing Namibia’s primary strike weapon before the fifth over.
Namibia Batting Scorecard
Namibia’s innings collapsed from a position that was manageable at the halfway stage, with the side eventually bowled out for 97 in 17.3 overs-the lowest total recorded at the T20 World Cup 2026 up to that point. Only two batters managed to cross 20 runs, and the middle order offered virtually no resistance once Pakistan introduced their spin options after the powerplay.
| Batter | Dismissal | Runs | Balls | 4s | 6s | Strike Rate |
| JN Frylinck | b Mirza | 9 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 81.81 |
| JN Loftie-Eaton | run out | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 |
| L Steenkamp | c Usman Khan b Nawaz | 23 | 22 | 3 | 1 | 104.54 |
| MG Erasmus (c) | c Usman Khan b Shadab | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 116.67 |
| A Busing-Volschenk | st Usman Khan b Shadab | 20 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 100.00 |
| JJ Smit | c Shadab b Nawaz | 9 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 69.23 |
| ZE Green | c Ayub b Shadab | 7 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 77.77 |
| R Trumpelmann | b Tariq | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| WP Myburgh | c Usman Khan b Tariq | 8 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 57.14 |
| BM Scholtz | b Tariq | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 50.00 |
| JT Brassell | not out | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 |
Extras: 7 (lb 3, w 4) | Fall of Wickets: 1-32, 2-39, 3-43, 4-49, 5-79, 6-81, 7-81, 8-95, 9-96, 10-97
The Collapse Explained
Namibia were 49/4 at the halfway mark-behind the required rate but not entirely out of contention on paper. Steenkamp’s 23 off 22 balls looked like it might set up a partial fightback, but what killed the chase wasn’t a single big over from Pakistan, it was a sustained inability to rotate strike against spin, which pushed the required run rate beyond reach within four overs. A closer look at the innings shows Namibia’s batters facing 57 dot balls out of 105 deliveries-more than half the innings produced no run at all. In T20 cricket, that kind of scoreless pressure almost always precedes a collapse, because required run rates escalate exponentially rather than linearly once dot-ball percentages cross the 50% threshold.
Lower-Order Resistance That Wasn’t
Namibia’s tail-Trumpelmann, Myburgh, Scholtz, and Brassell-combined for just 10 runs across their outings, a stark contrast to Pakistan’s lower order, where Shadab Khan’s unbeaten 36 effectively doubled as a middle-order finish. This gap in batting depth between the two sides is arguably the most understated factor behind the size of the margin.
Pakistan Bowling Figures
Pakistan’s spin trio of Mohammad Nawaz, Shadab Khan, and Usman Tariq combined for eight of Namibia’s ten wickets, turning a par chase into a rout. Pace bowlers Faheem Ashraf and Salman Mirza played only supporting roles in the new-ball phase, setting up the conditions for spin to finish the job.
| Bowler | Overs | Maidens | Runs | Wickets | Economy |
| Faheem Ashraf | 2 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 8.00 |
| Salman Mirza | 2 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 5.50 |
| Saim Ayub | 2 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 5.00 |
| Mohammad Nawaz | 4 | 0 | 22 | 1 | 5.50 |
| Shadab Khan | 4 | 0 | 19 | 3 | 4.75 |
| Usman Tariq | 3.3 | 1 | 16 | 4 | 4.57 |
Usman Tariq’s Career-Best Spell
Usman Tariq’s 4/16 stands as the standout bowling performance in this Pakistan National Cricket Team vs Namibia National Cricket Team Match Scorecard. Introduced only in the 12th over, his carrom ball deceived two batters through the gate, and his three-and-a-half-over spell effectively finished the contest before the death overs even began. What separates Tariq’s spell from a routine collapse-inducing performance is the variation he showed within a short burst. Rather than relying on one delivery repeatedly, he mixed his carrom ball with a conventional off-break and a slower leg-cutter, keeping Namibia’s tail-enders guessing on every delivery. That unpredictability is exactly what a maiden and a wicket-taking economy rate of 4.57 reflects.
Key Partnerships
Every significant partnership in Pakistan’s innings involved Sahibzada Farhan, underlining how central he was to the entire batting effort.

| Wicket | Runs | Balls | Batters Involved |
| 4th (unbroken) | 81 | 48 | Farhan – Shadab Khan |
| 2nd | 67 | 45 | Farhan – Agha |
| 1st | 40 | 31 | Farhan – Ayub |
| 3rd | 11 | 9 | Farhan Nafay |
The 81-run unbroken stand between Farhan and Shadab Khan is particularly notable because it came almost entirely in the back half of the innings, spanning overs 13 through 20-precisely the phase where Namibia’s bowling attack had no answers left.
Tactical Breakdown
Pakistan’s captaincy decision to hold back their frontline spinners until the middle overs proved decisive. Salman Agha introduced Shadab Khan and Usman Tariq only after the powerplay, timing their spin threat for when Namibia’s batters were still adjusting to the surface’s slower bounce. This sequencing-pace up front to control the powerplay, spin in the middle to attack-reflects modern T20 captaincy thinking rather than a rigid, formulaic bowling order. This decision also reveals a broader strategic pattern in how Pakistan have approached spin-friendly venues throughout the tournament. Rather than opening with their spinners to exploit fresh, two-paced pitches immediately, the team management has consistently preferred holding spin back until batters have committed to a set method against pace-then disrupting that rhythm entirely.
Statistical Depth and Advanced Metrics
Beyond the raw scorecard, deeper numbers reveal exactly why Pakistan won so convincingly. Boundary hitting and dot-ball pressure told two very different stories for each side across the twenty overs.
| Metric | Pakistan | Namibia |
| Boundary % of total runs | 63.3% (126/199) | 37.1% (36/97) |
| Dot-ball percentage | 30.8% | 54.3% |
| Wickets to spin bowling | 8 of 10 | Not applicable |
| Wickets to pace bowling | 1 of 3 | Not applicable |
Namibia’s 54.3% dot-ball rate against Pakistan’s spin attack is the single biggest number explaining the collapse. Teams that fail to rotate strike against spin in T20 cricket almost always see required run rates spiral out of control, and that’s exactly what happened after the 10-over mark in this match.
Powerplay Comparison
Pakistan raced to 47/1 in the powerplay, while Namibia managed only 32/3 in the same phase-a 15-run and two-wicket gap that set the tone for both innings and effectively decided the match before either side reached the halfway point of their respective innings.
Boundary Distribution
Pakistan’s 15 boundaries were spread relatively evenly across the innings, with five coming in the powerplay, six in the middle overs, and four in the death overs-evidence of consistent scoring pressure rather than a single explosive phase. Namibia’s four total boundaries, by comparison, were concentrated almost entirely in Steenkamp’s brief innings, highlighting how isolated their scoring threats were.
Head-to-Head Record
Pakistan remain unbeaten against Namibia across every format they’ve played, extending a perfect head-to-head record with this result.
| Date | Venue | Result |
| February 18, 2026 | Colombo | Pakistan won by 102 runs |
| October 2021 | Abu Dhabi | Pakistan won by 45 runs |
| February 2003 (ODI World Cup) | Kimberley | Pakistan won by 171 runs |
Pakistan’s average margin of victory exceeds 100 runs, underscoring the gulf in experience and depth between an established Test-playing nation and an associate side still building its white-ball infrastructure.
Group A Standings Impact
This win was the difference between Super Eight qualification and early elimination for Pakistan. The updated Group A table reflected the shift immediately after the result was confirmed.
| Team | Matches | Won | Lost | Points | NRR |
| India | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 | +3.050 |
| Pakistan | 4 | 3 | 1 | 6 | +0.976 |
| USA | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | +0.788 |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | -1.352 |
| Namibia | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | -3.108 |
Namibia finished bottom of Group A without a single win across the tournament, while Pakistan’s superior net run rate secured their qualification over USA on the final day of group action-meaning this exact 102-run margin played a direct role in the final standings, not just the individual result.

What This Result Means Going Forward
For Pakistan, the emphatic nature of this win-particularly the spin-heavy bowling performance-offered a tactical blueprint the team carried into the Super Eight stage against tougher, more settled batting lineups. For Namibia, despite the heavy defeat, individual performances like Steenkamp’s 23 provided evidence of genuine batting talent that associate cricket boards can build around for future World Cup cycles.
Frequently Asked Questions:
Who won the Pakistan vs Namibia match at the T20 World Cup 2026?
Pakistan won by 102 runs, restricting Namibia to 97 after posting 199/3.
Who was named Player of the Match?
Sahibzada Farhan, for his unbeaten century off 58 balls.
What was Namibia’s total in this match?
Namibia were bowled out for 97 in 17.3 overs.
Who took the most wickets in the match?
Usman Tariq finished with career-best figures of 4/16.
Was this Sahibzada Farhan’s first T20I century?
Yes, this was his maiden T20I hundred and the third century of the tournament overall.
What is the head-to-head record between Pakistan and Namibia in international cricket?
Pakistan have won all three meetings against Namibia across ODIs and T20Is, with an average winning margin of over 100 runs.
Did Namibia qualify for the Super Eight stage?
No, Namibia finished bottom of Group A with zero points from four matches.
What was Pakistan’s biggest partnership in the innings?
An unbroken 81-run stand between Sahibzada Farhan and Shadab Khan for the fourth wicket.
Where was the Pakistan vs Namibia match played?
The match was played at the Sinhalese Sports Club Ground in Colombo.
How did Pakistan’s bowling attack dismantle Namibia’s batting order?
Pakistan’s spin trio of Nawaz, Shadab Khan, and Usman Tariq took eight of the ten wickets, exploiting Namibia’s poor strike rotation against spin, evident in their 54.3% dot-ball rate.